The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (a) Veradigm had overstated its historical revenues by at least $20 million; (b) Veradigm had artificially inflated its revenue by recording duplicate transactions, among other things, over a more than two-year period; (c) Veradigm had artificially inflated its earnings and margins and materially misrepresented demand for the Company’s products and services during the class period; (d) Veradigm had failed to maintain effective internal controls over its financial reporting; (e) Veradigm had failed to comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) regarding appropriate revenue recognition practices; and (f) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial projections were materially false and misleading and lacked any reasonable basis.